← Both Kentucky markets
Competitive Analysis — Lexington DMA · YTD

Lexington Market Competitive Analysis

16 firms make up the local and regional legal-advertising field in Lexington, KY year-to-date, running roughly 69% Broadcast / 11% vMVPD / 20% CTV. This view measures delivered viewing volume.

Firms Tracked
16
Lexington · YTD
Streaming Share
42%
of full-market delivery
Market Leader
Morgan & Morgan
59% share of voice · of 16 firms
Competitive Landscape

Who's running — and where

Across Lexington, KY, 500+ legal advertisers were detected in market year-to-date. The local and regional competitive set of 16 firms runs roughly 69% Broadcast / 11% vMVPD / 20% CTV/Streaming. The bars below contrast the full detected market with that set, by share.

Full Lexington Market (500+ Firms) · Share of Delivery
Broadcast 49%
vMVPD 9%
CTV 42%
Lexington Competitive Set (16 firms) · Share of Delivery
Broadcast 69%
vMVPD 11%
CTV 20%
Broadcast (local stations & cable)
vMVPD (live-TV streaming bundles)
CTV / Streaming (true OTT apps)
Share of Competitive Set by Channel (% · YTD)
#FirmShare of Voice
of competitive set
Channel MixBroadcast %vMVPD %CTV %
Majors
1Morgan & Morgan Injury Law Firm58.9%
62%11%27%
2Isaacs & Isaacs11.1%
83%9%8%
3Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer5.8%
82%14%4%
4Minner Vines Injury Lawyers5.8%
84%12%4%
5Hughes & Coleman Injury Lawyers5.7%
58%12%30%
Mid-Pack
6Golden Law Office4.5%
86%8%6%
7Go Big Injury Law3.0%
91%7%2%
8Willey Trial Lawyers2.1%
94%5%1%
9Hicks & Funfsinn1.6%
60%17%23%
10Kaufman & Stigger Injury Lawyers0.7%
63%20%17%
11Stromatt & Associates0.5%
99%1%0%
12Becker Law Office0.3%
94%2%4%
13Karl Truman Law Office0.1%
4%33%63%
14Desmond Law Office0.0%
11%41%48%
15Thomas Law Offices0.0%
30%30%40%
Challengers
16CB White Law0.0%
93%4%3%

Share of Voice is each firm's share of the 16-firm competitive set shown here — not the full market.

Publisher Intelligence

Share of voice — who owns what

Share of voice across the competitive set — the 16 firms competing in Lexington year-to-date, by publisher.

Publisher Share — % of Competitive Set
Competitor Share of Voice by Publisher Each firm's share of the competitive set's impressions on that publisher.

“Other competitors” covers the 1 smaller firms in the set beyond the top 15, each under 1% of impressions on any publisher shown above.

Firms: Morgan & MorganIsaacs & IsaacsMorgan, Collins, Yeast & SalyerMinner VinesHughes & ColemanGolden Law OfficeGo Big Injury LawWilley Trial LawyersHicks & FunfsinnKaufman & StiggerStromatt & AssociatesBecker Law OfficeKarl Truman Law OfficeDesmond Law OfficeThomas Law Offices Other competitors

Ranked competitor detail by publisher

Each card is one publisher. Top 5 advertisers ranked by SOV on that publisher. Click Show all to expand to every competitor in the set with measurable impressions.

WKYT
Broadcast
28% of set delivery · 14 of 16 active
  1. 1
    Morgan & Morgan
    55.0%
  2. 2
    Isaacs & Isaacs
    21.1%
  3. 3
    Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer
    6.7%
  4. 4
    Minner Vines
    5.4%
  5. 5
    Hughes & Coleman
    3.9%
Show all 14 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Go Big Injury Law
    3.0%
  2. 7
    Willey Trial Lawyers
    1.9%
  3. 8
    Golden Law Office
    1.8%
  4. 9
    Becker Law Office
    1.0%
  5. 10
    Hicks & Funfsinn
    0.2%
  6. 11
    CB White Law
    0.1%
  7. 12
    Kaufman & Stigger
    0.1%
  8. 13
    Karl Truman Law Office
    0.0%
  9. 14
    Stromatt & Associates
    0.0%
WLEX
Broadcast
25% of set delivery · 15 of 16 active
  1. 1
    Morgan & Morgan
    41.5%
  2. 2
    Minner Vines
    10.5%
  3. 3
    Golden Law Office
    9.6%
  4. 4
    Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer
    7.9%
  5. 5
    Hughes & Coleman
    7.3%
Show all 15 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Isaacs & Isaacs
    7.3%
  2. 7
    Go Big Injury Law
    6.0%
  3. 8
    Willey Trial Lawyers
    4.8%
  4. 9
    Hicks & Funfsinn
    2.7%
  5. 10
    Stromatt & Associates
    2.0%
  6. 11
    Kaufman & Stigger
    0.4%
  7. 12
    Thomas Law Offices
    0.0%
  8. 13
    Desmond Law Office
    0.0%
  9. 14
    Karl Truman Law Office
    0.0%
  10. 15
    Becker Law Office
    0.0%
YouTube App
Streaming App
11% of set delivery · 15 of 16 active
  1. 1
    Morgan & Morgan
    96.5%
  2. 2
    Hughes & Coleman
    1.3%
  3. 3
    Kaufman & Stigger
    0.6%
  4. 4
    Minner Vines
    0.5%
  5. 5
    Golden Law Office
    0.4%
Show all 15 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Isaacs & Isaacs
    0.3%
  2. 7
    Karl Truman Law Office
    0.3%
  3. 8
    Becker Law Office
    0.0%
  4. 9
    Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer
    0.0%
  5. 10
    Hicks & Funfsinn
    0.0%
  6. 11
    Thomas Law Offices
    0.0%
  7. 12
    Go Big Injury Law
    0.0%
  8. 13
    Desmond Law Office
    0.0%
  9. 14
    Willey Trial Lawyers
    0.0%
  10. 15
    Stromatt & Associates
    0.0%
OTA
Broadcast
4% of set delivery · 13 of 16 active
  1. 1
    Morgan & Morgan
    59.2%
  2. 2
    Isaacs & Isaacs
    8.0%
  3. 3
    Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer
    7.9%
  4. 4
    Hughes & Coleman
    6.0%
  5. 5
    Minner Vines
    5.6%
Show all 13 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Golden Law Office
    4.1%
  2. 7
    Hicks & Funfsinn
    3.0%
  3. 8
    Go Big Injury Law
    2.6%
  4. 9
    Willey Trial Lawyers
    2.1%
  5. 10
    Kaufman & Stigger
    1.4%
  6. 11
    Stromatt & Associates
    0.1%
  7. 12
    Becker Law Office
    0.0%
  8. 13
    CB White Law
    0.0%
WYMT
Broadcast
4% of set delivery · 13 of 16 active
  1. 1
    Morgan & Morgan
    58.5%
  2. 2
    Isaacs & Isaacs
    17.3%
  3. 3
    Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer
    10.6%
  4. 4
    Minner Vines
    5.6%
  5. 5
    Go Big Injury Law
    2.8%
Show all 13 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Willey Trial Lawyers
    1.7%
  2. 7
    Hughes & Coleman
    1.3%
  3. 8
    Golden Law Office
    1.1%
  4. 9
    Becker Law Office
    0.7%
  5. 10
    Hicks & Funfsinn
    0.4%
  6. 11
    Kaufman & Stigger
    0.1%
  7. 12
    CB White Law
    0.0%
  8. 13
    Karl Truman Law Office
    0.0%
Spectrum Streaming
vMVPD
4% of set delivery · 16 of 16 active
  1. 1
    Morgan & Morgan
    60.2%
  2. 2
    Isaacs & Isaacs
    12.0%
  3. 3
    Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer
    6.8%
  4. 4
    Hughes & Coleman
    5.3%
  5. 5
    Minner Vines
    4.8%
Show all 16 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Golden Law Office
    3.6%
  2. 7
    Hicks & Funfsinn
    2.3%
  3. 8
    Go Big Injury Law
    1.8%
  4. 9
    Kaufman & Stigger
    1.4%
  5. 10
    Willey Trial Lawyers
    1.2%
  6. 11
    Karl Truman Law Office
    0.2%
  7. 12
    Desmond Law Office
    0.2%
  8. 13
    Thomas Law Offices
    0.1%
  9. 14
    Becker Law Office
    0.1%
  10. 15
    Stromatt & Associates
    0.0%
  11. 16
    CB White Law
    0.0%
YouTube TV App
vMVPD
4% of set delivery · 16 of 16 active
  1. 1
    Morgan & Morgan
    62.4%
  2. 2
    Minner Vines
    8.1%
  3. 3
    Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer
    7.8%
  4. 4
    Hughes & Coleman
    7.3%
  5. 5
    Isaacs & Isaacs
    6.3%
Show all 16 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Go Big Injury Law
    2.1%
  2. 7
    Hicks & Funfsinn
    2.0%
  3. 8
    Golden Law Office
    2.0%
  4. 9
    Kaufman & Stigger
    1.0%
  5. 10
    Karl Truman Law Office
    0.5%
  6. 11
    Willey Trial Lawyers
    0.3%
  7. 12
    Becker Law Office
    0.1%
  8. 13
    Desmond Law Office
    0.1%
  9. 14
    Thomas Law Offices
    0.0%
  10. 15
    Stromatt & Associates
    0.0%
  11. 16
    CB White Law
    0.0%
Other App
Streaming App
2% of set delivery · 16 of 16 active
  1. 1
    Morgan & Morgan
    71.1%
  2. 2
    Hughes & Coleman
    13.3%
  3. 3
    Hicks & Funfsinn
    4.7%
  4. 4
    Isaacs & Isaacs
    3.0%
  5. 5
    Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer
    2.8%
Show all 16 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Minner Vines
    1.7%
  2. 7
    Golden Law Office
    1.4%
  3. 8
    Go Big Injury Law
    0.6%
  4. 9
    Kaufman & Stigger
    0.5%
  5. 10
    Desmond Law Office
    0.3%
  6. 11
    Willey Trial Lawyers
    0.2%
  7. 12
    Karl Truman Law Office
    0.2%
  8. 13
    Thomas Law Offices
    0.1%
  9. 14
    Becker Law Office
    0.0%
  10. 15
    Stromatt & Associates
    0.0%
  11. 16
    CB White Law
    0.0%
Dish Streaming
vMVPD
2% of set delivery · 16 of 16 active
  1. 1
    Morgan & Morgan
    55.0%
  2. 2
    Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer
    9.5%
  3. 3
    Isaacs & Isaacs
    9.2%
  4. 4
    Hughes & Coleman
    7.0%
  5. 5
    Minner Vines
    6.4%
Show all 16 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Golden Law Office
    3.7%
  2. 7
    Hicks & Funfsinn
    3.2%
  3. 8
    Go Big Injury Law
    2.5%
  4. 9
    Willey Trial Lawyers
    1.5%
  5. 10
    Kaufman & Stigger
    1.5%
  6. 11
    Karl Truman Law Office
    0.2%
  7. 12
    Desmond Law Office
    0.1%
  8. 13
    Becker Law Office
    0.1%
  9. 14
    Stromatt & Associates
    0.0%
  10. 15
    Thomas Law Offices
    0.0%
  11. 16
    CB White Law
    0.0%
Roku
Device
2% of set delivery · 16 of 16 active
  1. 1
    Morgan & Morgan
    67.1%
  2. 2
    Hughes & Coleman
    9.0%
  3. 3
    Isaacs & Isaacs
    7.6%
  4. 4
    Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer
    3.7%
  5. 5
    Golden Law Office
    3.6%
Show all 16 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Minner Vines
    3.1%
  2. 7
    Hicks & Funfsinn
    2.6%
  3. 8
    Kaufman & Stigger
    1.2%
  4. 9
    Go Big Injury Law
    0.8%
  5. 10
    Willey Trial Lawyers
    0.5%
  6. 11
    Karl Truman Law Office
    0.4%
  7. 12
    Desmond Law Office
    0.2%
  8. 13
    Thomas Law Offices
    0.1%
  9. 14
    Becker Law Office
    0.1%
  10. 15
    Stromatt & Associates
    0.0%
  11. 16
    CB White Law
    0.0%
WDKY
Broadcast
2% of set delivery · 9 of 16 active
  1. 1
    Morgan & Morgan
    50.8%
  2. 2
    Isaacs & Isaacs
    13.0%
  3. 3
    Kaufman & Stigger
    12.3%
  4. 4
    Minner Vines
    9.4%
  5. 5
    Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer
    7.5%
Show all 9 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Golden Law Office
    4.0%
  2. 7
    Hughes & Coleman
    2.9%
  3. 8
    Hicks & Funfsinn
    0.1%
  4. 9
    Karl Truman Law Office
    0.0%
Tubi TV App
Streaming App
2% of set delivery · 14 of 16 active
  1. 1
    Hughes & Coleman
    48.4%
  2. 2
    Isaacs & Isaacs
    24.3%
  3. 3
    Morgan & Morgan
    14.6%
  4. 4
    Hicks & Funfsinn
    7.7%
  5. 5
    Golden Law Office
    4.4%
Show all 14 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Minner Vines
    0.2%
  2. 7
    Karl Truman Law Office
    0.1%
  3. 8
    Desmond Law Office
    0.1%
  4. 9
    Becker Law Office
    0.1%
  5. 10
    Kaufman & Stigger
    0.1%
  6. 11
    Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer
    0.0%
  7. 12
    Thomas Law Offices
    0.0%
  8. 13
    Go Big Injury Law
    0.0%
  9. 14
    Willey Trial Lawyers
    0.0%
DirecTV Streaming
vMVPD
1% of set delivery · 16 of 16 active
  1. 1
    Morgan & Morgan
    55.2%
  2. 2
    Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer
    9.2%
  3. 3
    Isaacs & Isaacs
    9.1%
  4. 4
    Hughes & Coleman
    6.7%
  5. 5
    Minner Vines
    6.1%
Show all 16 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Golden Law Office
    4.1%
  2. 7
    Hicks & Funfsinn
    3.4%
  3. 8
    Go Big Injury Law
    2.3%
  4. 9
    Kaufman & Stigger
    1.6%
  5. 10
    Willey Trial Lawyers
    1.5%
  6. 11
    Karl Truman Law Office
    0.3%
  7. 12
    Desmond Law Office
    0.2%
  8. 13
    Thomas Law Offices
    0.1%
  9. 14
    Becker Law Office
    0.1%
  10. 15
    Stromatt & Associates
    0.1%
  11. 16
    CB White Law
    0.0%
INSP
1% of set delivery · 2 of 16 active
  1. 1
    Morgan & Morgan
    100.0%
  2. 2
    Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer
    0.0%
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Amazon Fire
Device
1% of set delivery · 16 of 16 active
  1. 1
    Morgan & Morgan
    66.3%
  2. 2
    Hughes & Coleman
    10.8%
  3. 3
    Isaacs & Isaacs
    6.1%
  4. 4
    Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer
    4.1%
  5. 5
    Minner Vines
    3.6%
Show all 16 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Hicks & Funfsinn
    2.4%
  2. 7
    Golden Law Office
    2.3%
  3. 8
    Go Big Injury Law
    1.3%
  4. 9
    Kaufman & Stigger
    1.2%
  5. 10
    Karl Truman Law Office
    0.7%
  6. 11
    Willey Trial Lawyers
    0.6%
  7. 12
    Desmond Law Office
    0.2%
  8. 13
    Thomas Law Offices
    0.1%
  9. 14
    Becker Law Office
    0.1%
  10. 15
    Stromatt & Associates
    0.0%
  11. 16
    CB White Law
    0.0%
Competitor Creative

The creative landscape

Active spots running in the Lexington market this period.

MMIL
Call Now
Morgan & Morgan Injury Law Firm
Personal Injury
MCYS
Call Today
Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer
Personal Injury
MVIL
Free Consultation
Minner Vines Injury Lawyers
Personal Injury
HCIL
Free Consultation
Hughes & Coleman Injury Lawyers
Personal Injury
BLO
Contact Us
Becker Law Office
Personal Injury

Methodology and Definitions

1. Data Sourcing & Collection

Our platform uses Automatic Content Recognition (ACR) to capture real-time viewing data from the "glass" of over 23 million opted-in U.S. households, across a diverse panel of devices (Vizio, LG) and peripheral inputs. Each captured ad is fingerprinted and matched against a comprehensive ad library to verify when and where it aired.

2. Competitive Set & Scope

This report covers the legal advertisers competing for clients in the market — firms based here or in a neighboring state with a genuine local presence. Non-law advertisers, and national campaigns that only spill incidental connected-TV impressions into the market, are excluded so the field reflects real local competition.

For large national advertisers, we judge local presence by their share of local-broadcast delivery — the signal that a firm is actually buying local affiliate inventory, not just airing national connected-TV. Morgan & Morgan clears that test here (a meaningful share of its delivery is on local Louisville and Lexington broadcast), so it is included. Dimopoulos, by contrast, delivers almost entirely through national connected-TV with virtually no local broadcast, so it is set aside as spillover. Share of voice and all channel splits are measured across this set.

3. Channel Categorization

Each advertiser's activity is split across three mutually exclusive channels.

Broadcast
Local station-originated linear & cable inventory
Local OTA broadcast affiliates (ABC/NBC/CBS/FOX), national broadcast networks, syndicated broadcast, and traditional linear cable + satellite (Xfinity, Spectrum, Cox, Charter, DirecTV dish, Dish Network) — viewed via antenna or linear MVPD carriage.
vMVPD
Streaming delivery of linear feeds
YouTube TV, Hulu Live, Sling, fuboTV, Philo, DirecTV Stream, Cox Streaming, XFINITY Streaming, Spectrum Streaming, Dish Streaming, Uverse Streaming. Streaming delivery, but content includes broadcast-originated station feeds — kept as a separate line for clarity.
CTV / Streaming
True streaming, app-based CTV
Ad-supported streaming apps (Peacock, Pluto, Tubi, Paramount+), peripheral devices (Roku, Fire TV, Apple TV, Xbox, PlayStation), FAST channels, and digital video / app-based CTV inventory.

Publisher definitions

4. Key Attribution Information

Why vMVPD is its own line. When a viewer watches a local broadcast affiliate through a streaming bundle (YouTube TV, DirecTV Stream, Cox Streaming, Hulu Live, etc.), the delivery is internet-based but the content is broadcast-originated linear. Buyers and sellers treat vMVPD distinctly from both pure broadcast and true OTT — so we report it as a separate line rather than rolling it into either.

Satellite vs. streaming MVPDs. DirecTV satellite dish is reported as Cable. DirecTV Stream (the internet-delivered linear app) is reported as vMVPD.

OTA (Over-the-Air). Free broadcast signals received via antenna from local ABC/NBC/CBS/FOX affiliates. Reported under Broadcast.

A predominantly broadcast-led advertiser will still show single-digit-to-low-teens CTV/Streaming exposure in this view because ACR captures actual viewing across the connected-TV panel — including incidental impressions on Roku, Fire TV, Tubi, Apple TV, Pluto, Peacock, network broadcaster apps, and similar ad-supported streaming platforms. Those carry their own ad inventory distinct from the linear feed (and from vMVPDs), so they're reported under CTV / Streaming.

5. Glossary