27 firms make up the local and regional legal-advertising field in Louisville, KY year-to-date, running roughly 88% Broadcast / 3% vMVPD / 9% CTV. This view measures delivered viewing volume.
Across Louisville, KY, 528+ legal advertisers were detected in market year-to-date. The local and regional competitive set of 27 firms runs roughly 88% Broadcast / 3% vMVPD / 9% CTV/Streaming. The bars below contrast the full detected market with that set, by share.
| # | Firm | Share of Voice of competitive set | Channel Mix | Broadcast % | vMVPD % | CTV % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Majors | ||||||
| 1 | Morgan & Morgan Injury Law Firm | 44.0% | 81% | 3% | 16% | |
| 2 | Sam Aguiar Injury Lawyers | 15.5% | 97% | 2% | 1% | |
| 3 | Karl Truman Law Office | 9.0% | 94% | 1% | 5% | |
| 4 | Isaacs & Isaacs | 8.8% | 92% | 4% | 4% | |
| 5 | Kaufman & Stigger Injury Lawyers | 7.6% | 93% | 1% | 6% | |
| Mid-Pack | ||||||
| 6 | Hughes & Coleman Injury Lawyers | 4.9% | 80% | 3% | 17% | |
| 7 | Desmond Law Office | 2.7% | 93% | 3% | 4% | |
| 8 | Thomas Law Offices | 1.4% | 98% | 1% | 1% | |
| 9 | Daniels Associates | 0.9% | 98% | 1% | 1% | |
| 10 | Church Langdon Lopp & Banet Law | 0.8% | 98% | 1% | 1% | |
| 11 | DeCamillis & Mattingly | 0.8% | 98% | 1% | 1% | |
| 12 | Becker Law Office | 0.7% | 97% | 2% | 1% | |
| 13 | Sullivan Law | 0.7% | 97% | 1% | 2% | |
| 14 | Crooks, Bell & Dodds PLLC | 0.6% | 98% | 2% | 0% | |
| 15 | Alex R White | 0.5% | 98% | 1% | 1% | |
| Challengers | ||||||
| 16 | Michael Sullivan Law | 0.3% | 96% | 1% | 3% | |
| 17 | The Fleck Firm | 0.2% | 77% | 3% | 20% | |
| 18 | Damron Law | 0.2% | 99% | 1% | 0% | |
| 19 | Velez Law, PLLC | 0.1% | 90% | 2% | 8% | |
| 20 | Minner Vines Injury Lawyers | 0.1% | 11% | 42% | 47% | |
| 21 | CB White Law | 0.0% | 98% | 2% | 0% | |
| 22 | Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer | 0.0% | 7% | 80% | 13% | |
| 23 | Louisville Injury Law Firm | 0.0% | 79% | 3% | 18% | |
| 24 | Golden Law Office | 0.0% | 14% | 60% | 26% | |
| 25 | Hicks & Funfsinn | 0.0% | 16% | 24% | 60% | |
| 26 | Go Big Injury Law | 0.0% | 20% | 71% | 9% | |
| 27 | Willey Trial Lawyers | 0.0% | 19% | 74% | 7% | |
Share of Voice is each firm's share of the 27-firm competitive set shown here — not the full market.
Share of voice across the competitive set — the 27 firms competing in Louisville year-to-date, by publisher.
“Other competitors” covers the 12 smaller firms in the set beyond the top 15, each under 2% of impressions on any publisher shown above.
Each card is one publisher. Top 5 advertisers ranked by SOV on that publisher. Click Show all to expand to every competitor in the set with measurable impressions.
Active spots running in the Louisville market this period.
Our platform uses Automatic Content Recognition (ACR) to capture real-time viewing data from the "glass" of over 23 million opted-in U.S. households, across a diverse panel of devices (Vizio, LG) and peripheral inputs. Each captured ad is fingerprinted and matched against a comprehensive ad library to verify when and where it aired.
This report covers the legal advertisers competing for clients in the market — firms based here or in a neighboring state with a genuine local presence. Non-law advertisers, and national campaigns that only spill incidental connected-TV impressions into the market, are excluded so the field reflects real local competition.
For large national advertisers, we judge local presence by their share of local-broadcast delivery — the signal that a firm is actually buying local affiliate inventory, not just airing national connected-TV. Morgan & Morgan clears that test here (a meaningful share of its delivery is on local Louisville and Lexington broadcast), so it is included. Dimopoulos, by contrast, delivers almost entirely through national connected-TV with virtually no local broadcast, so it is set aside as spillover. Share of voice and all channel splits are measured across this set.
Each advertiser's activity is split across three mutually exclusive channels.
Publisher definitions
Why vMVPD is its own line. When a viewer watches a local broadcast affiliate through a streaming bundle (YouTube TV, DirecTV Stream, Cox Streaming, Hulu Live, etc.), the delivery is internet-based but the content is broadcast-originated linear. Buyers and sellers treat vMVPD distinctly from both pure broadcast and true OTT — so we report it as a separate line rather than rolling it into either.
Satellite vs. streaming MVPDs. DirecTV satellite dish is reported as Cable. DirecTV Stream (the internet-delivered linear app) is reported as vMVPD.
OTA (Over-the-Air). Free broadcast signals received via antenna from local ABC/NBC/CBS/FOX affiliates. Reported under Broadcast.
A predominantly broadcast-led advertiser will still show single-digit-to-low-teens CTV/Streaming exposure in this view because ACR captures actual viewing across the connected-TV panel — including incidental impressions on Roku, Fire TV, Tubi, Apple TV, Pluto, Peacock, network broadcaster apps, and similar ad-supported streaming platforms. Those carry their own ad inventory distinct from the linear feed (and from vMVPDs), so they're reported under CTV / Streaming.